My mom and I have both done our DNA on Ancestry, and we each have our own tree. My tree is ridiculously large (55,437 people as of today), since it includes all of our cluster research, while Mom's tree only includes her direct ancestors. The smaller tree with just direct ancestors is easier to download, and it helps focus attention ON the direct ancestors (and not on interesting collateral relatives LOL).
The decision to include, or leave out, non-direct ancestors can definitely affect how Ancestry displays its AncestryDNA Insights:
My "DNA Circles" includes Joshua Whitehead and Sarah Avery, and correctly gives their relation to me. Notice Samuel Avery and Mary Thornton, parents of Sarah Avery, on this page as well. |
© 2016 Copyright, Christine Manczuk, All Rights Reserved.
This morning I decided to see what would happen if I attach my DNA to your tree.
ReplyDeleteYou lost some matches and got some new ones (mostly the Davis upline of Shepard/Porter). I thought that was odd.
DeleteIt didn't appear to move the status of Avery/Whitehead from Discovery to Ancestor Circles. Maybe at some point it will change over?
So far it appears that existing relationships are now categorized as "emerging."
DeleteChristine,
ReplyDeleteI want to let you know that your blog post is listed in today's Fab Finds post at http://janasgenealogyandfamilyhistory.blogspot.com/2016/07/follow-friday-fab-finds-for-july-22-2016.html
Have a great weekend!
Thank you so much, Jana! :-)
Delete