As you can see from the two facing pages of marriage allegations (including that of William Heath, possibly my paternal ninth great grandfather, on the top left), each entry was made by a different man, none of whose writing is particularly legible to modern eyes.
[Ancestry.com. London and Surrey, England, Marriage Bonds and Allegations, 1597-1921 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Original data: Marriage Bonds and Allegations. London, England: London Metropolitan Archives. Surrey Marriage Bonds and Allegations records held by the London Metropolitan Archives, London, England.]
However in my experience, studying an enlarged version of the relevant text together with a sample of 17th century letter forms for comparison can be very helpful.
[Ancestry.com. London and Surrey, England, Marriage Bonds and Allegations, 1597-1921 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. Original data: Marriage Bonds and Allegations. London, England: London Metropolitan Archives. Surrey Marriage Bonds and Allegations records held by the London Metropolitan Archives, London, England.]
[Martin Billingsley, The Pens Excellencie or the Secretaries Delighte (1618). Source: English Handwriting 1500-1700, an online course]
And here's how I read the two lines extracted above:
...that William Heath of St Andrews in Eastcheap haberdasher and a bachelor aged...Now to check my work. Is it credible?
Eastcheap* (cheap coming from the Old English word for market) has been a street in the City of London since at least medieval times. The churches commonly associated with it are St. Leonard Eastcheap and St. Clement Eastcheap which was worrying, but through further research I learned that there used to be a St. Andrews in Eastcheap that wasn't rebuilt after the Great Fire of 1666.** On the 1653 London map below, Eastcheap is numbered "12" on the legend.***
[A map of London, designed to help country men to find their way around the city, 1653. British Library]
[London from Southwark. Oil on wood. Artist-Dutch School, 17th century (1626 AD - 1655 AD0 Museum of London]
[findmypast.co.uk © Images reproduced by courtesy of The Haberdashers’ Company, London, England]
Edward Compton was the Master under whom William served his apprenticeship of seven years during which time he would have lived in Compton's house. He was subject to strict rules while learning his trade and wouldn't have been allowed to marry until after he was accepted into the Company as a Freeman.
[Haberdashers Shop 17th Century with Shopkeeper, Customer & Chapman. findmypast.com Newsletter May 2015]
As a haberdasher what would have been in William's shop?
"The origin of the word “haberdasher” is unclear although it is generally considered to be taken from the Anglo-Norman word ‘haberdache’, sometimes rendered as ‘hapertas’, which means ‘small goods’. A haberdashery was a shop that would sell accessory items such as hats, scarves, gloves, shawls, parasols, needles, buttons and thread."Why did William Heath bring Solomon Valman(?) of Fenchurch to the office of the Lord Bishop of London to vouch for him in the allegation? Since he and Anne were planning to be married by license and not publicly announced banns, an allegation was required that there was no impediment to the marriage, including consanguinity.
[Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Volume 2, by John McClintock, James Strong; Harper, 1868.
Source: Google Books]
[St Dunstan and All Saints, Stepney Parish (Tower Hamlets, Middlesex, England), marriages, 1631-1686, William Heath and Anny Hale, 2 July 1634; Church of England Parish Registers, 1538-1812. London, England: London Metropolitan Archives; digital images, London, England, Marriages and Burials, 1538-1812 database on Ancestry.com(http://search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=1624 : accessed 15 Aug 2015).]
All of this means that I'm confident about the circumstances of the William Heath who married Anne Hale (or Gale) in 1634. What I'm not so sure of is whether he's the same man who emigrated to Virginia sometime around 1650.
Unfortunately for William Heath (if this is the right person), the rise of puritanism in the 17th century led to hard times for haberdashers as fashions became plainer and less ornamented. Perhaps that's why he chose to emigrate to Virginia in the early years of the Commonwealth.
*Now in the Eastcheap Conservation Area (PDF).
**Also known as St. Andrew Hubbard, it was joined with St Mary at Hill during the rebuilding after the Great Fire. Fortunately the church records survived the fire.
***Note that the coat of arms of the Haberdashers is the second one from the top of the left side of the map.
****The second in order of precedence of The Twelve Great Livery Companies of London.
© 2015 Copyright, Christine Manczuk, All Rights Reserved.
Oh, this is so interesting. Bit mean of you not to mention the toutou in the illustration, its my understanding that every haberdasher was required to have one on the premises. Great detective work, now if you can get him to the US that would be good. You should also add a tag of "worshipful company of haberdashers" or would a search turn him up since you have "haberdasher". You should write a book about this research, maybe as connected to the liveries, or if that's been done, something ese. And about deciphering the handwriting.
ReplyDeleteI am wondering if you've made further progress in your research on William Heath and if he is the William who was transported in 1650 to Virginia. I am going back and forth between Thomas Heath and Sir Robert Heath as his father - there are numerous trees and discussions about William and they each show either Sir Robert or Thomas. I am getting quite confused. Hopefully, you've found the answer. It is certainly doubtful that a son of Sir Robert would have apprenticed as a haberdasher although not impossible. So who are YOUR William Heath's parents?
ReplyDelete